USAID Wants to Know Your Dress Size

AT Lucas

— 3 min read
Share

Everyone on earth is saying the Super Bowl is gay now.

Recently, a reader was surprised to learn that I no longer watch football. At the time, I said it was because of all the BLM shit. But the deeper truth is that the cultural programming around the sport has become so insidious and low-consciousness that it genuinely sickens me.

This year's halftime show:

Why are they always promoting gender-bending?

Erasing gender is a core objective for the architects of urban monoculture
He's got the trashy girl-tattoos and bikini top.

They are winning.

This commenter brings up two interesting points. 1. You not accepting urban monoculture is hate. 2. They are winning (77.4 million monthly listeners on Spotify)

What's going on here?

The stuff surrounding the NFL is just part of a wider concept I'd like to introduce:

📘 Urban Monoculture — The deliberate standardization of culture across societies, where film, fashion, consumerism, and social customs are synchronized through global governance and corporate systems. What looks like diversity is in fact convergence: individuals stripped of local and national identity, atomized into units defined primarily by how they interact with markets and the state.

Lots to unpack about this topic, but I have a lot of stuff to do today so I'll quickly introduce to you how Urban Monoculture is manufactured:

1. Funding Flows

Government money (USAID, State Dept., NED) → moves into civil society NGOs, media outlets, schools, unions, and arts programs.

  • This creates the illusion that change is grassroots when it is actually underwritten by external capital.

2. Credibility Laundering

  • Direct government propaganda has low trust.
  • NGOs, journalists, teachers, artists, and activists appear “independent.”
  • The formula Benz quoted: “Government has the money but not the credibility; civil society has the credibility but not the money.”
  • Result: state talking points emerge from trusted local voices, masking their foreign origin.

3. Cultural Template Export

  • Grants and partnerships come with conditions: adopt “modern” values, “good governance,” and “civil society strengthening.”
  • This means rewriting textbooks, standardizing media frames, curating arts, setting red lines in politics, and shaping youth culture.
  • Local traditions, languages, or identities that conflict with global alignment are defunded or stigmatized.

4. Enforcement by Dependency

  • Civil society groups, media, and unions grow dependent on foreign grants and training.
  • Cut the funding, and they collapse.
  • Keep the funding, and they must replicate the same slogans, frameworks, and policies—whether on “democracy promotion,” “human rights,” or “disinformation.”

5. Narrative Synchronization

  • Once the pipeline is established, films, fashion, journalism, and consumer rituals reflect the same global frames.
  • What looks like cultural diversity (different outlets, different NGOs, different influencers) is actually harmonized messaging produced from the same funding architecture.

6. Result: The Monoculture

  • Distinct national or local identities weaken.
  • The individual’s main role becomes:
    1. Consumer in globalized markets.
    2. Citizen-subject defined by compliance with governance narratives.
  • This is the endpoint of the process: atomized people living inside a standardized cultural operating system.

Learn more about the covert US State Department soft power warfare being unleashed across the world by listening to Mike Benz. Here are a couple of interviews to get you started:

If you are picking up on what seems like a conspiracy, this will help your theory.

Tactics for shaping foreign regimes and how they are being used domestically.

Stay vigilant. We are in an information war, and every signal deserves scrutiny.

Is Mike Benz obfuscating Israeli involvement?

What do you think?

1. If the same soft-power toolkit once used abroad is now shaping our media, sports, and entertainment at home, how much of what we call “popular culture” is actually organic?

2. Who benefits when mass-audience rituals like the Super Bowl stop reflecting local identity and instead echo the same global values pipeline seen in foreign “civil society” programs?

COMMENT BELOW!

Read more