XX Waffen
Starmer's regime send what appears to be sharia police to threaten to take a lady's daughter into custody if she doesn't hand over her phone.
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) September 21, 2025
The child's "crime"?
Looking at a social media post!
This is England 2025.
pic.twitter.com/Yr4Xx1i4Rz
The female ideological shock troops are here and they are big mad.
Let's double up on yesterday's nod to 1984.
The Swallowers of Slogans

The Spies and the Anti-Sex League are clear examples of how the Party mobilizes citizens into miniature enforcement squads. But Katherine, the wife of Winston — the novel’s main character — is the most chilling personal version of this. To him she wasn’t just an estranged partner but a vessel of Party discipline — dutiful to the point of absurdity, parroting slogans even in the bedroom and reducing intimacy to a state-mandated obligation. In her, you see how women could be conscripted as ideological enforcers, weaponizing moral orthodoxy and even sexuality as tools of control.
Sexuality as Ideological Enforcement for Men

Dating Apps for Ideological Enforcement
- Curation of Values: Tinder doesn’t just let people list hobbies; it presents a menu of “approved” causes and identities. If you want to signal your moral worth, you’re funneled into that list. That’s a form of pre-packaged orthodoxy.
- Social Incentives: Women in particular can deploy these tags as filters — both to broadcast virtue and to screen out men who don’t share the same ideological alignment. It turns dating into ideological vetting. Men feel like their chances for sex and reproduction improve if they adopt these values as well.
- Soft Policing: Just like Orwell’s “Spies” or Anti-Sex League, this system enlists individuals (often women) as frontline enforcers of conformity. No central Thought Police officer has to knock on your door — the pressure comes from your desire not to be excluded from mating and social life.
It is very common to see female bios loaded up on these activist cuases, pronouns, and warnings like "no MAGA" or "no trumpers".
The state is the modern provider
Women have evolved to adopt the beliefs and values of their providers as a survival strategy, ensuring security by aligning with the men who controlled resources and protection. This is why they have become enforcers of state-driven orthodoxy.

So what do you think?
Do modern welfare systems, student loans, and government jobs act as the new “husband” — steering women’s political alignment?
In dating and marriage, are women shifting politically to match their male partners, or are men increasingly shifting to match women in order to gain access to sex?